Northstar is Running out of Time

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member REITWrecks.com. You can read the full article on the REIT Wrecks blog.

Whew! After a furious year of churning CMBS, repurchasing outstanding corporate debt and refinancing its bank loans, among other feats, Northstar Realty Finance (NRF) actually ended the year with a little bit of cash. That’s the good news. The bad news is they’re going to need it.

Northstar now has about $238 million in cash, which includes the all important figure of $138.9 million in unrestricted cash. This is discretionary cash, the kind of stuff that Hamamoto can use to expense dinners at Bobby Van’s. The remaining $99.4 million is bottled up inside Northstar’s CDOs, and the ability to profitably reinvest that cash is diminishing by the day as credit spreads tighten and the CDO reinvestment periods expire.

If you strip out all the non-GAAP AFFO noise from NAREIT, you can see the nail-biting story unfolding: Northstar’s cash flows from continuing operations have been declining rapidly. It’s true, Northstar did manage to generate $54 million in cash for all of 2009, but that’s down from $88 million in 2008 and $102 million in 2007. Obviously, an almost 50% drop in operating cash flow is not the sign of a healthy business, but the fact that Northstar is currently in an unhealthy business should also come as no surprise.

The question is, what can Northstar do about it? In the short term, the answer is not much. Northstar’s portfolio is running off, interest rates are at all time lows, and Northstar’s CDO funding model is dead. 2009 interest income of $142.2 million was $70 million less than 2008, and $150 million less than 2007. As Northstar’s asset balances decline, so too have Northstar’s advisory fees and rental income.

The lack of good options may be why NRF is attempting replace this revenue with management fees, and in the meantime Hamamoto is generating a lot of work for his accounting department with the debt buybacks and CMBS trading, but all of this is clearly a stop gap, and it’s just not enough.

Not only that, management fees are not ramping up nearly as fast as Northstar needs them to ramp up, and at the current pace, they may never ramp up. Northstar Realty Income Trust, the new non-traded REIT, has not yet been declared effective by the SEC, and Northstar can’t start raising money in earnest until that happens.

However, judging by its new Reg D offering, Northstar Income Opportunity REIT I, Northstar’s shiny new Denverbroker/dealer operation isn’t knocking the cover off the ball. The first investor commitment was made on September 24th, but as of early February, Northstar Income REIT I had only raised $3.1 million in equity. This is certainly not failure, but managing $3.1 million will definitely not pay the rent at 399 Park Avenue. Furthermore, starting a broker/dealer from scratch is neither cheap nor risk free. Northstar must now comply with a whole new raft of federal and state securities laws, and be exposed to the liability that arises from selling shares to retail investors through hundreds of rowdy, independent securities brokers across the country.

On top of paying rent on the 18th floor, dinner at Bobby Van’s, and the expense of starting up a brand new broker/dealer, under its new credit facility with Wells Fargo, Northstar must make $30 million in annual amortizationpayments. Also, through its loan book, NRF is on the hook for $80 million in future funding commitments, of which only $51.9 million will come out of the CDOs. $50 million in operating cash flow doesn’t create a huge margin for error in a capital intensive business, so Northstar will likely have to borrow most of the remaining $28.1 million using credit facilities.

So what is Hamamoto thinking? That’s unclear, but NRF is definitely walking a tightrope, and that may explain the management and board changes at the end of Q4. Curiously, REITs have collectively raised almost $30 billion of debt and equity capital since the crisis began, and Crexus, Colony Capital and Starwood Capital were among several Mortgage REITs to raise almost $1.5 billion. Somehow, despite the stellar performance of its portfolio, NRF just barely managed to squeeze $25.7 million out of this deluge.

Some portfolio managers I know have said that Hamamoto is not part of the “REIT Mafia”, and therefore he is not always invited to the REIT fundraising parties. This may or may not be true, but I’m not sure what else could explain NRF’s decision to throw a hail mary into the cesspool of Reg D offerings and non-traded REITs.

I spent all day reading the 10K in search of an answer, and it seemed to confirm the REIT Mafia conspiracy theory, as well as the fact that NRF has chosen a particularly rocky path to circumvent it:

“we cannot currently raise large amounts of corporate equity capital at attractive levels…we hope that our reputation in the marketplace will enable us to be early in raising corporate capital when market conditions improve.”

One thing is for sure, Reg D offerings and non-traded REITs won’t do much for NRF’s reputation, so shareholders may also want to hope there is a contingency plan brewing somewhere on the 18th floor.

Level 3 Expands in Northern California

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member Rob Powell of TelecomRamblings.com. You can read the full article on Rob’s blog.

Level 3 Communications (LVLT) brought its local markets initiative to northern California. They will be grouping together the markets of San Francisco, San Jose, Oakland, and Sacramento with a general manager, and will be adding both capacity and staff in the region. This is the second such initiative on the west coast, the first being up inSeattle last summer. No doubt we will see a southern California initiative at some point as well, however San Francisco is the last of the markets the company has publicly scheduled.

Unlike on the east coast where they acquired multiple metro footprints of different types per market, Level 3’s metro assets on the west coast are more homogeneous. They consist of the original Level 3 build plus a bit from Looking Glass, and whatever metro bits and pieces Broadwing and WilTel had (not much). Because that footprint has mostly wholesale origins, Level 3 begins its SF Bay area initiative in the mid-market enterprise segment with 450 miles of metro fiber but relatively few actual enterprise customers relative to its other markets.

So far, the company has said that its local markets initiative has been having a very positive effect on sales where it has been introduced. However, those effects have thus far not been large enough to really show up in the overall numbers. Perhaps that is both due to the length of sales cycles and to more general churn related to both the economy and internal shifts in focus. In 2010 the market will be looking for that to change as the effort gains both scope and momentum.

New Futures Contracts

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member Asset Prime. You can read the full article on the AssetPrime blog.

Last month, a couple of the major commodities exchanges announced the addition of some new futures contracts to help producers and consumers of raw goods hedge their expenses, and simultaneously give commodities traders three more reasons to develop stress-related ulcers.

First, across the pond, the world’s foremost metals market, the London Metal Exchange (LME) last week opened trading of cobalt and molybdenum futures. In shocking concordance with my previous post about the emerging need for a lithium futures contract, the cobalt contract is designed specifically with battery manufacturers in mind, cobalt being a major input to rechargeable batteries in things like laptops and cellphones. Molybdenum, which I had never heard of before this Wall Street Journal article, is apparently used in the production of stainless steel.

Meanwhile, here in the States, the ever-growing Chicago Mercantile Exchange announced that it will be adding a contract for distiller’s dried grain (DDG), a by-product of corn ethanol production. This is interesting because, with the addition of the contract, which will begin trading in April, ethanol producers can now effectively hedge every step of their production. For example, before the harvest you might buy a corn contract so as to protect yourself from unexpected price swings at your local grain elevator. Then, once you’ve got your corn and begin distilling ethanol, you can sell both a DDG and ethanol contract to lock in prices for your two resultant byproducts. Further, you can buy or selloilgas, or natural gas contracts to take advantage of spread deviations between the fuels. This is also interesting because the DDG contract may become a major hedge-staple for corporations that produce ethanol for non-fuel purposes… you know, like Jack Daniel’s. The government, and now the private markets, are conspiring to make ethanol a real and viable energy source with plenty of economic safegaurds.

A bizarre reaction to these announcements is concern that opening these contracts to the public will increase volatility in the prices of the commodities and could potentially drive them too far one way or the other. Yes, that is true, prices will become more volatile… but only for the traders. The hedgers (people producing and consuming ethanol) actually need volatility to protect themselves from things like price-fixing and sudden, unexpected swings. Without an open public market, there’s no way to plan for and predict what DDG would and will cost. To be clear, hedgers are not entering and exiting positions over and over to make a quick buck, they are locking prices in, exiting positions, and taking the difference as market protection.

Five Reasons Why the Pound is Being Pounded

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member Kathy Lien of KathyLien.com and FX360.com. You can readthe full article on her blog.

With mixed to slightly better than expected U.K. economic data, traders may be scratching their heads about why theBritish pound has collapsed more than 300 pips this week. Here are a couple of reasons:

  1. Britain’s Prudential announced plans to buy AIG’s Asia operations for $35.5 billion in cash and stock – since this is partially a cash deal, it will involve selling British pounds.
  2. Gilts Losing Luster – According to the FT, the gap between the U.K. and German interest rate has risen to the highest level since 2005. Even though the official U.K. interest rate is less than the Eurozone’s interest rate, the cost of servicing government borrowing in the U.K. over Germany has increased significantly. Click here for my chart comparing the UK-GE 10 Year Bond Yields
  3. BoE Could Raise QE – Based upon the dovish comments from Bank of England officials at the beginning of last week, there is a tiny risk of the BoE raising the size of their QE program on Thursday. Even if they do not, the tone of their statement will be dovish which is also bearish for the GBP.
  4. Short GBP/USD Positions Hit Record Highs – According to the CFTC Commitment of Traders report published on Friday, short GBP and EUR positions have hit the highest level ever. Forex traders are clearly very bearish pounds and they have good reasons to be with jobless claims at 12 year highs and consumer spending falling by the most since Feb 2009.
  5. Stop Orders Tripped, Hedge Fund Selling – There has also been a lot of chatter about hedgies selling the GBP. There were a ton of stop orders sitting at the previous 9 month low of 1.5117. When the GBP/USD broke that level, the currency pair dropped very quickly. The selling exacerbated when stop orders at the 1.50 level were tripped, but the big move came when the GBP/USD broke below 1.4935 – it fell 158 pips in 3 minutes.

With so many straws on the camel’s back, it was bound to fall under the pressure. A bounce is not out of the question after such a big move particularly since the GBP/USD has not able to rally for the past 9 trading days. However unless the BoE stops talking about QE and we don’t expect them too, the GBP will continue to be the worst performing currency.

Finally, the GBP/AUD has hit a record low. Last week, I blogged about how shorting GBP/AUD is my favorite trade. At the time it was trading above 1.73 and today it hit a low of 1.6545. Hopefully you managed to bank some solid profits. I still expect it to move lower – but this is where trailing stops should be implemented to lock in profits. Click here for my technical chart comparing GBP/AUD

Preliminary Hedge Fund Data for February 2010

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member Richard Wilson of HedgeFundBlogger.com. You can read the full article on Richard’s blog.

Global hedge funds managed to post modest gains in February 2010. A large trend, as reported last week, was betting against the Euro while largely avoiding stocks. Early data for last month shows that the average hedge fund increased 0.34%. The mild gains may help offset a disappointing January and weak returns in the end of 2009.

Hedge funds are not required to release their returns and so any indication of performance is closely followed. Later this week several other firms that track performance and flows are expected to release their numbers.

“Overall, hedge funds are still cautious on equities, but appear to have returned to commodities,” the analysts wrote, adding that hedge funds continue to buy energy and metals during the last week of February while also adding to “their bearish position on the Euro.” The euro has lost roughly 5.25 percent against the dollar this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, managers at Soros Fund Management, SAC Capital Advisors and Greenlight Capital were betting against the euro.

Already during the fourth quarter George Soros’s hedge fund more than doubled its bet on the price of goldSource

Warren Buffett & Berkshire Hathaway’s Annual Letter

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire members MarketFolly. You can read the full article on the Market Folly blog.

For those of you who haven’t had a chance to read this yet (shame on you), here it is: Warren Buffett’s annual letter andBerkshire Hathaway’s annual report. For value investors and future Buffett wanna-be’s, this is must-read material.

One very interesting thing to note about Buffett’s letter is how he mentions that many of Berkshire’s holdings heavily rely on consumer spending and housing demand. While Berkshire has obviously survived [2008 Financial Crisis|the crisis]], those are areas many foresee a very slow recovery in. So, those companies will have to operate efficiently as they continue to face challenges. At the same time though, Buffett took advantage of the crisis to secure many solid deals and acted on his old adage of buying when others are fearful. He even expanded on this with an excellent new quote, saying “When it’s raining gold, reach for a bucket, not a thimble.”

Additionally, as we assumed when we reviewed Warren Buffett’s portfolio, he confirmed that he sold positions to finance his impending acquisition of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe. And this purchase continues to signify a growing trend in Buffett’s portfolio: he’s investing in industries that have monopolies or near-monopolies.

Buffett’s letter gives his take on the economy, his investments, and various Berkshire components. You can directly download the .pdf here.

Of course a lot of criticism surrounding the letter is the lack of discussion regarding succession plans for when Buffett eventually steps down. This is a legitimate concern for investors and in the past we’ve posted up a great video that examines potential successor candidates at Berkshire. Many think Sokol will be the man for the job, but we’ll have to wait and see.

So while his latest letter didn’t provide any breakthrough new information, it’s always good to hear his thoughts. For more great investment reads, head to Warren Buffett’s recommended reading list.

Top 10 Hottest ETFs – March 2010

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member Blain Reinkensmeyer of StockTradingToGo.com. You can read the full article on on Blain’s Blog.

Looking to add some hot Exchange Traded FundsETFs – to your investment portfolio?

If so you need to read the list below which consists of the 10 best ETFs based on overall return from the last month. Note: ETFs must trade atleast 50,000 shares per day to be included.

Top ETFs

  1. Direxion Real Estate Bull 3X (DRN), up 14.36%
  2. Direxion Small Cap Bull 3X (TNA) up 11.46%
  3. Direxion China Bull 3X (CZM), up 11.09%
  4. ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE), up 9.66%
  5. Direxion Midcap Bull 3X (MWJ), up 9.14%
  6. ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM), up 8.15%
  7. ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD), up 8.11%
  8. ProShare Ultra Russel 2000 (UWM), up 7.38%
  9. Spider S&P Retail (XRT), up 7.32%
  10. ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV), up 7.20%

Pretty noticeable to see that the majority of ETFs are ultra and triple leveraged. Due to new regulation the marginrequired to buy these types of funds has been increased but they still remain extremely popular.

Still Want to Buy the Loonie on this Pullback

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member CreditWritedowns.com. You can read the full article on the CreditWritedowns blog.

Canada reported a somewhat disappointing Q4 09 current account data yesterday, but this is not sufficient to change our preference to buy Canadian dollars on weakness.

The current account shortfall was C$9.8 bln instead of the C$8.5 bln the consensus expected. Adding insult to injury the Q3 deficit, already a record, was revised lower to -C$13.8 bln from -C$13.1 bln. The improvement was slower than the market had expected in Q4 and the external sector may be a drag on Canadian growth in the coming quarters.

But this has already been acknowledged by officials and appears to have been taken on board by the market. And Canadian growth appears to have picked up considerably in Q4. Canada will report Q4 GDP on Monday, March 1. It is likely to be 10-fold better than the 0.4% annualized pace reported in Q3.

In addition, there is some speculation that Canadian officials may soon provide some more guidance on the unwinding of some of its extraordinary liquidity facilities. Such a statement could be seen as early as March 2nd after the Bank of Canada policy meeting (which no one expects any change in policy). The Bank of Canada has already ended two of its three main emergency lending programs. The last one is a term repo facility and officials have committed themselves to ending in late June.

In recent weeks we have recommended being long Canadian dollars against sterling. The bounce earlier this week got our stop, but at current levels we like being long CAD vs the US dollar, but also the Mexican peso.

Energy ETFs: The Tracking Problem

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member Hard Assets Investor. You can read the full article on the Hard Assets Investor Blog.

For the average investor, the commodities markets can be daunting. Many investors don’t possess the capital and/or risk tolerance necessary to invest directly in the futures markets. Further, although the number of online brokerages that offer futures trading is growing, for the most part, buying or selling commodity futures requires setting up a special account, which, for many retail investors, may be more trouble than it’s worth.

Enter the commodity ETF.

Commodity ETFs are relatively new, but that hasn’t stopped them from attracting investors—in 2009 alone, commodity exchange-traded products brought in $30.1 billion in new investment. Although some precious metals funds actually hold the goods in question—the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSE: GLD), for example, actually keeps gold bars in a vault—this strategy is impossible for most commodities, whose worth is determined by their usefulness. As such, commodity ETFs purporting to track prices in other classes of good require some type of derivative investing; in the commodities world, that means futures contracts.

However, by their very nature, commodity ETFs allow investors to make longer-term bets on the value of a given commodity than is typical in the futures market. The futures trader makes money simply if the price of oil for delivery in a given month goes up between now and that month’s contract expiration. But for the fund investor, who buys shares of an oil ETF expecting the price to rise over the next several months or years, the case is not so cut and dried.

As we’ve covered before, it comes back to the structure of the fund. If, for example, an ETF holds only the front-month contract for a given commodity, then that contract must be sold before its expiration, and the next (soon to be front-month) contract must be purchased in its place. Since the two contracts are almost certain to have some price discrepancy, the difference on this roll must be factored into the return of the fund.

What’s more, a futures-based commodity ETF is part of a secondary market on top of the already volatile futures market. As investors buy and sell shares of what is essentially ownership of other financial instruments, the fund’s value may fall out of whack with the commodity it is purporting to track. After all, demand for an ETF may be very different than demand for the futures contracts that ETF tracks: Just look at the U.S. Natural Gas Fund (NYSE: UNG). With these potential pitfalls in mind, let’s compare the relationships between several energy commodity ETFs and the front-month prices of the commodities they purport to track. A regression analysis should help us get an understanding for how well (or poorly) a given ETF truly tracks a commodity.

Let’s look at the funds with the highest trading volume in oilnatural gas and gasoline: the U.S. Oil Fund (NYSE: USO); the U.S. Natural Gas Fund (NYSE: UNG) and the U.S. Gasoline Fund (NYSE: UGA)]]. Each of these funds invests in the front-month contract only, reflecting the simple, long and unleveraged approach. All data is close of day from the fund’s inception to 2/12/2010, as compared with equivalent sessions for each commodity.

Click here to continue reading this article on HardAssetsInvestor.com…


Pensions Reverse Course

Today’s Daily Angle comes from Wikinvest Wire member Saj Karsan of BarelKarsan.com. You can read the full article on Saj’s blog.

What a difference a year can make! Last year at this time, as the market set low after low, investors were cautioned to be aware of companies with defined benefit pension plans. Since shareholders are on the hook for the pension obligations, any drop in pension plan assets (as a result of the market declines) should result in a drop to a company’s valuation.

This year, the opposite effect is taking place. As companies with fiscal years ending on December 31st will release their annual reports in the coming weeks, companies with defined benefit plans will likely see improved financial positions! Since pension asset values are only reported once a year, investors using 3rd quarter reports are likely underestimating the value of their companies under study. In other words, companies with defined benefit plans are likely worth more than investors are giving them credit for!

As an example, consider Twin Disc (TWIN), a company we discussed as a potential value investment last year. Last year, the value of the company’s pension assets fell by $24 million, pushing the company to cease accruing pension benefits for employees. For a company with a market cap of just $100 million, this change in the value of its pension assets is clearly material to the value of the stock.

Since the broad market has gained significantly in last several months, Twin’s assets have likely experienced a material gain as well. Unfortunately, until the 10-K comes out (and for TWIN, that is not for several months, as their fiscal year-end is not the same as the calendar year-end), all the investor can do is estimate the gains.

Unfortunately, estimating gains is not easy. While companies do disclose their planned asset allocations, determining the rise in values of private equity or real-estate investments is not an easy task. Furthermore, in the interests of conservatism, investors are cautioned from being overly optimistic when estimating returns. However, in cases where pension assets are material, recognition of this issue can help the investor improve the accuracy of his valuation.